A. K. K. NAMBIAR versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The order of suspension was validly passed under Rule 7(3) of the All India Service (Appeal and Discipline) Rules, 1955, as there was a pending investigation and trial on criminal charges. There was no evidence or proper pleading of mala fides against the suspension order; the affidavits were not properly verified and could not support the claim. Thus, no vice or illegality in the suspension order was established.
- Parties
- Appellant: A. K. K. Nambiar; Respondents: Union of India & Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 1969
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Delhi High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Suspension of Public Servant, Mala Fides, Affidavit Verification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. K. K. Nambiar
Appellant
Union of India & Anr.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Delhi High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order of suspension was made under the correct rule of the All India Service (Appeal and Discipline) Rules, 1955?
- 2 Whether the order of suspension suffered from mala fides?
- 3 Whether the affidavits in support of mala fides were admissible?
Ratio Decidendi
The order of suspension was validly passed under Rule 7(3) of the All India Service (Appeal and Discipline) Rules, 1955, as there was a pending investigation and trial on criminal charges. There was no evidence or proper pleading of mala fides against the suspension order; the affidavits were not properly verified and could not support the claim. Thus, no vice or illegality in the suspension order was established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Each party shall bear its own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment