A. M. ALLISON versus B. L. SEN
The fixing of minimum basic wages by notification under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, was correlated to an existing work-load (16 seers for male, 12 seers for female labourers); extra wages at 6 ps. per seer remain payable for quantities above the basic work-load. The claim for extra wages does not amount to a claim for lesser payment than the minimum wage under section 20(1) of the Act, and thus falls outside the jurisdiction of the authority under that section. High Court's refusal of writ justice is sustained.
- Parties
- Appellant: A. M. Allison; Respondent: B. L. Sen
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 1956
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment on Appeal From Assam High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal Dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Minimum Wages, Writ Jurisdiction, Certiorari, Industrial Disputes, Labour Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. M. Allison
Appellant
B. L. Sen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment on Appeal From Assam High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether fixing minimum basic wages alters entitlement to extra wages for work done beyond basic work-load as per Minimum Wages Act, 1948?
- 2 Whether claim for extra wages for work done in excess of basic work-load is a claim for 'payment of less than the minimum rates of wages' under s. 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948?
- 3 Whether a writ of certiorari should be granted against the High Court's exercise of discretion under Article 226 after concurrent factual findings?
Ratio Decidendi
The fixing of minimum basic wages by notification under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, was correlated to an existing work-load (16 seers for male, 12 seers for female labourers); extra wages at 6 ps. per seer remain payable for quantities above the basic work-load. The claim for extra wages does not amount to a claim for lesser payment than the minimum wage under section 20(1) of the Act, and thus falls outside the jurisdiction of the authority under that section. High Court's refusal of writ justice is sustained.
Court Disposition
Appeal Dismissed
Orders
- Each party to bear its own costs of appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment