A. R. DAHIYA versus SEBI
The appellant was required to disclose the buy-back transaction with HSIDC and the price paid for the shares in the public announcement under Regulations 16 and 20. The post-dated cheques issued in consideration for the buy-back amounted to an acquisition, regardless of subsequent dishonour. The transaction triggered disclosure obligations and the SEBI order directing a fresh public announcement at the higher buy-back price was upheld.
- Parties
- Appellant: A. R. Dahiya; Respondent: SEBI
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Securities Appellate Tribunal Judgment Dated 19.04.2006
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Takeover Regulations, Disclosure Obligations, Acquisition of Shares, Buy Back Arrangements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A. R. Dahiya
Appellant
SEBI
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Securities Appellate Tribunal Judgment Dated 19.04.2006
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the buy-back transaction of shares between appellant and HSIDC required disclosure in the public announcement under SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997
- 2 Whether dishonouring of post-dated cheques negates acquisition of shares under SEBI Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was required to disclose the buy-back transaction with HSIDC and the price paid for the shares in the public announcement under Regulations 16 and 20. The post-dated cheques issued in consideration for the buy-back amounted to an acquisition, regardless of subsequent dishonour. The transaction triggered disclosure obligations and the SEBI order directing a fresh public announcement at the higher buy-back price was upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- SEBI's order dated 1.8.2003 requiring appellant to make a fresh public announcement and offer to shareholders at Rs. 23.75 per share along with interest at 15% per annum is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment