ABDUL HAMID SHAMSI versus ABDUL MAJID AND OTHERS

ABDUL HAMID SHAMSI versus ABDUL MAJID AND OTHERS

The plaintiff in a suit for accounts is not obliged to state the exact amount, but cannot choose a valuation figure arbitrarily or unreasonably. The court has a duty to reject such a valuation and remit the issue for reconsideration. It may take into account whether the suit is within its pecuniary jurisdiction, passing appropriate orders accordingly.

Parties
Appellant: Abdul Hamid Shamsi; Respondent: Abdul Majid; Respondent: Other respondents
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
12 April 1988
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court's Order
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Court Fees, Valuation of Suits, Pecuniary Jurisdiction, Dissolution of Partnership, Rendition of Accounts
Civil Procedure Partnership Law Court Fees Valuation of Suits Pecuniary Jurisdiction Dissolution of Partnership Rendition of Accounts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abdul Hamid Shamsi

Appellant

Abdul Majid

Respondent

Other respondents

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court's Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff can arbitrarily value a suit for accounts for court fee and jurisdiction purposes.
  2. 2 Whether the court has power to reject an arbitrary or unreasonable valuation in a suit for accounts.

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff in a suit for accounts is not obliged to state the exact amount, but cannot choose a valuation figure arbitrarily or unreasonably. The court has a duty to reject such a valuation and remit the issue for reconsideration. It may take into account whether the suit is within its pecuniary jurisdiction, passing appropriate orders accordingly.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Issue of correct valuation remitted to trial court for reconsideration.
  • Trial court may consider plaintiff's ouster from partnership and whether suit's tentative value is within pecuniary jurisdiction.