RESHAM SINGH PYARA SINGH versus ABDUL SATTAR

RESHAM SINGH PYARA SINGH versus ABDUL SATTAR

No Letters Patent Appeal lies to the Division Bench from the order of the single Judge passed in appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, as barred by Section 104(2) CPC.

Parties
Petitioner: Resham Singh Pyara Singh; Respondent: Abdul Sattar
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
20 November 1995
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Appeal From Division Bench Order of Bombay High Court Rejecting Letters Patent Appeal
Outcome
Petitions dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeals, Interlocutory Orders, Injunction, Letters Patent Appeal
Civil Procedure Appeals Interlocutory Orders Injunction Letters Patent Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Resham Singh Pyara Singh

Petitioner

Abdul Sattar

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Appeal From Division Bench Order of Bombay High Court Rejecting Letters Patent Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a Letters Patent Appeal lies to the Division Bench against an interlocutory order of a single Judge passed in appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC.

Ratio Decidendi

No Letters Patent Appeal lies to the Division Bench from the order of the single Judge passed in appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, as barred by Section 104(2) CPC.

Court Disposition

Petitions dismissed

Orders

  • Special Leave Petitions are dismissed.