ABDUL WAHAB ANSARI versus STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.
Previous sanction under Section 197 CrPC is a jurisdictional requirement and can be raised at any stage, not only at the framing of charge; the alleged act of ordering firing to control a mob was performed in discharge of official duty and thus Section 197 applies, rendering cognizance without sanction invalid.
- Parties
- Appellant: Abdul Wahab Ansari; Respondent: State of Bihar; Complainant Respondent: Respondent No. 2 (son of deceased)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Patna High Court Decision in Crl. M. No. 18954 of 1995
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Section 197 Cr PC, Sanction for Prosecution of Public Servant, Discharge of Official Duty, Jurisdiction of Magistrate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdul Wahab Ansari
Appellant
State of Bihar
Respondent
Respondent No. 2 (son of deceased)
Complainant Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Patna High Court Decision in Crl. M. No. 18954 of 1995
Legal Issues
- 1 At what stage can the plea regarding previous sanction under Section 197 CrPC be raised?
- 2 Whether the alleged act was performed in discharge of official duty attracting Section 197 CrPC?
Ratio Decidendi
Previous sanction under Section 197 CrPC is a jurisdictional requirement and can be raised at any stage, not only at the framing of charge; the alleged act of ordering firing to control a mob was performed in discharge of official duty and thus Section 197 applies, rendering cognizance without sanction invalid.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Criminal proceedings quashed qua the appellant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment