ABDULRASAKH versus K. P. MOHAMMED & ORS.
Minor defects in the election petition were permitted to be cured by the Judge, not by the Registry, within stipulated time and before notice to the appellant; therefore, the petition's presentation was within time as per s.81(1) of the Representation of People Act, 1951, and the appeal challenging summary dismissal was meritless and dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Abdulrasakh; Respondent: K. P. Mohammed; Respondents: Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Election Petitions, Corrupt Practices, Limitation, Defective Pleadings, Supply of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdulrasakh
Appellant
K. P. Mohammed
Respondent
Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether curing minor defects in election petition beyond original presentation violates limitation under s.81(1) of Representation of People Act, 1951
- 2 Whether Registry can return and permit curing of defects in election petition
- 3 Whether supply of material objects (mobile phone chip) is mandated under s.81(3)
Ratio Decidendi
Minor defects in the election petition were permitted to be cured by the Judge, not by the Registry, within stipulated time and before notice to the appellant; therefore, the petition's presentation was within time as per s.81(1) of the Representation of People Act, 1951, and the appeal challenging summary dismissal was meritless and dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; parties to bear own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment