AGARWAL ENGINEERING CO. versus TECHNOIMPEX HUNGARIAN MACHINE INDUSTRIES
Annexures B1 and B2 are self-contained contracts for the specific sale of EK 25 and EK 13A machinery; the arbitration clause in those contracts (clause 8) governs any disputes related to those sales. Annexure C is a later and separate agency agreement for future transactions and expressly does not have retroactive effect over earlier contracts. Therefore, the arbitration clause in B1 and B2 applies to the present dispute.
- Parties
- Appellant: Agarwal Engineering Co.; Respondent: Technoimpex Hungarian Machine Industries
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 1977
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Order Dated 3 2 1976 of the Calcutta High Court in Award Matter No. 109 of 1975.
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Clauses in Multiple Contracts, Novation of Contract, Agency Agreements, Foreign Trade Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Agarwal Engineering Co.
Appellant
Technoimpex Hungarian Machine Industries
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Order Dated 3 2 1976 of the Calcutta High Court in Award Matter No. 109 of 1975.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitration clause in the later agency agreement (Annexure C) supersedes the arbitration clause in the earlier contracts for sale of machinery (Annexures B1 and B2).
Ratio Decidendi
Annexures B1 and B2 are self-contained contracts for the specific sale of EK 25 and EK 13A machinery; the arbitration clause in those contracts (clause 8) governs any disputes related to those sales. Annexure C is a later and separate agency agreement for future transactions and expressly does not have retroactive effect over earlier contracts. Therefore, the arbitration clause in B1 and B2 applies to the present dispute.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- If the respondent, in writing by August 15, 1977, chooses any particular tribunal of Arbitration set up by any Chamber of Commerce in Bombay or Calcutta, the reference of the dispute will go to that body; otherwise, the Tribunal of Arbitration of the Bharat Chamber of Commerce will have jurisdiction and continue the...
- The arbitrators will decide the rights and liabilities of the parties according to clause 8 in Annexures B1 and B2.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment