AIR INDIA versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Section 8 of the Air Corporation (Transfer of Undertakings and Repeal) Act, 1994 does not expressly save or mention the Air India Employees Service Regulations; it only protects terms and conditions of service for employees as on the date of repeal. Thus, the Regulations ceased to be effective from 29th January, 1994.
- Parties
- Appellant: Air India; Respondents: Union of India and Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Judgment Following Dismissal of Writ Petition by Delhi High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Repeal of Statutes, Savings of Subordinate Legislation, Employment Regulations, Standing Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Air India
Appellant
Union of India and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Judgment Following Dismissal of Writ Petition by Delhi High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether subordinate legislation survives repeal of the parent Act in absence of a saving clause in the repealing Act
- 2 Whether Air India Employees Service Regulations framed under Air Corporations Act, 1953 continued after its repeal by the Air Corporations (Transfer of Undertakings and Repeal) Act, 1994
Ratio Decidendi
Section 8 of the Air Corporation (Transfer of Undertakings and Repeal) Act, 1994 does not expressly save or mention the Air India Employees Service Regulations; it only protects terms and conditions of service for employees as on the date of repeal. Thus, the Regulations ceased to be effective from 29th January, 1994.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment