SHRI A.K. NIGAM AND ORS. versus SHRI SUNIL MISRA AND ANR.
Seniority in IRPS is determined by the date for increment in time scale as per Principle (vii) (a), not strictly by date of joining. Appellants' seniority was properly reckoned by granting maximum weightage for past service, and respondent No. 1, being a direct recruit with a later date of increment, is junior to the appellants.
- Parties
- Appellant: AK. Nigam; Appellant: K. Thiagarajan; Appellant: Suresh Kumar; Respondent: Sunil Misra; Respondent: Respondent No. 2 (unnamed)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central Administrative Tribunal Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Seniority, Promotion, Weightage for Past Service
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AK. Nigam
Appellant
K. Thiagarajan
Appellant
Suresh Kumar
Appellant
Sunil Misra
Respondent
Respondent No. 2 (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central Administrative Tribunal Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether seniority in the Indian Railway Personnel Service (IRPS) is to be determined strictly by date of appointment or can be influenced by weightage for past service as per relevant principles
- 2 Whether the grant of maximum weightage of five years for promotee officers is valid and reasonable under the governing principles
Ratio Decidendi
Seniority in IRPS is determined by the date for increment in time scale as per Principle (vii) (a), not strictly by date of joining. Appellants' seniority was properly reckoned by granting maximum weightage for past service, and respondent No. 1, being a direct recruit with a later date of increment, is junior to the appellants.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The order of Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi dated 5th March, 1993 is set aside.
- Parties to bear their own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment