ALCHEMIST LIMITED AND ANR. versus STATE BANK OF SIKKIM AND ORS.

ALCHEMIST LIMITED AND ANR. versus STATE BANK OF SIKKIM AND ORS.

Facts pleaded by appellant (registered office, communications, deposit, negotiations at Chandigarh) were not material, essential, or integral to the cause of action underlying their claim. As substantial part of the cause of action arose in Sikkim, High Court of Punjab & Haryana rightly found want of territorial jurisdiction and dismissed the writ petition.

Parties
Appellant: Alchemist Limited; Respondent No.1: State Bank of Sikkim; Respondent No.2: State of Sikkim
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
16 March 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal Against High Court Decision Dismissing Writ Petition for Want of Territorial Jurisdiction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Article 226 Writ Jurisdiction, Territorial Jurisdiction, Cause of Action

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alchemist Limited

Appellant

State Bank of Sikkim

Respondent No.1

State of Sikkim

Respondent No.2

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal Against High Court Decision Dismissing Writ Petition for Want of Territorial Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether any part of the cause of action arose within the territorial jurisdiction of the Punjab & Haryana High Court to entertain the writ petition filed under Article 226

Ratio Decidendi

Facts pleaded by appellant (registered office, communications, deposit, negotiations at Chandigarh) were not material, essential, or integral to the cause of action underlying their claim. As substantial part of the cause of action arose in Sikkim, High Court of Punjab & Haryana rightly found want of territorial jurisdiction and dismissed the writ petition.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • High Court order upholding preliminary objection and dismissing writ petition for want of territorial jurisdiction affirmed
  • Parties to bear their own costs