ALLAHABAD BANK versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
The High Court did not examine whether Sections 19(2) (proviso) and 20 of the Urban Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976 applied; the matter is remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration on merits.
- Parties
- Appellant: Allahabad Bank; Respondents: State of West Bengal and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Dismissal of Writ Petition by Calcutta High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of; impugned order set aside; matter remitted to High Court for fresh consideration.
- Legal Topics
- Urban Land Ceiling, Regulation of Excess Land, Permission to Sell Land, Delay in Filing Writ Petition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allahabad Bank
Appellant
State of West Bengal and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Dismissal of Writ Petition by Calcutta High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court erred in summarily dismissing the writ petition on grounds of delay without examining the applicability of Sections 19(2) and 20 of the Urban Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court did not examine whether Sections 19(2) (proviso) and 20 of the Urban Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976 applied; the matter is remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration on merits.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of; impugned order set aside; matter remitted to High Court for fresh consideration.
Orders
- Impugned order of Calcutta High Court set aside
- Matter remitted to High Court for fresh consideration on merits
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment