PARASHRAM THAKUR DASS & OTHERS versus RAM CHAND S/O SHRI RADHUMAL & OTHERS
The State Government could not allot the plots to the appellants without recording reasons in writing for dispensing with public auction and without considering the claims of other applicants; the grant made in favour of the appellants was contrary to law and rightly quashed by the High Court.
- Parties
- Appellants: Parashram Thakur Dass & Others; Respondents: Ram Chand S/o Shri Radhumal & Others; Respondents: Respondents Nos. 17-19
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Allotment of Nazul Land, Displaced Persons, Public Auction, Leasehold Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Parashram Thakur Dass & Others
Appellants
Ram Chand S/o Shri Radhumal & Others
Respondents
Respondents Nos. 17-19
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the State Government could allot nazul plots without public auction and without considering claims of all applicants
- 2 Whether reasons for not holding auction must be recorded in writing as per Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code and Rules
Ratio Decidendi
The State Government could not allot the plots to the appellants without recording reasons in writing for dispensing with public auction and without considering the claims of other applicants; the grant made in favour of the appellants was contrary to law and rightly quashed by the High Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The order granting plots to the appellants is quashed.
- State Government is directed to consider the several claims for allotment of land.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment