ALPIC FINANCE LTD. versus P. SADASIVAN AND ANR.
There was no wilful misrepresentation or fraudulent inducement by the respondents at the time of entering into the lease agreement; the dispute was of civil nature and essential ingredients of criminal offences were not satisfied. Therefore, the quashing of the criminal proceedings by the High Court was justified.
- Parties
- Appellant: Alpic Finance Ltd.; Respondent: P. Sadasivan; Respondent: Second respondent (wife of P. Sadasivan)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order Quashing Criminal Proceedings
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Quashing of Criminal Proceedings, Cheating, Criminal Breach of Trust, Lease Finance, Jurisdiction Under Section 482 Cr.p.c.
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alpic Finance Ltd.
Appellant
P. Sadasivan
Respondent
Second respondent (wife of P. Sadasivan)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order Quashing Criminal Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether allegations in the complaint make out a criminal offence of cheating or breach of trust under IPC.
- 2 Whether proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. where transaction is of civil nature.
Ratio Decidendi
There was no wilful misrepresentation or fraudulent inducement by the respondents at the time of entering into the lease agreement; the dispute was of civil nature and essential ingredients of criminal offences were not satisfied. Therefore, the quashing of the criminal proceedings by the High Court was justified.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- High Court order quashing the criminal proceedings is upheld.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment