ALUMINIUM CORPORATION versus THEIR WORKMEN AND ORS.

ALUMINIUM CORPORATION versus THEIR WORKMEN AND ORS.

The employer failed to prove, with proper evidence, its claims under both the 'rehabilitation charge' and 'return on reserves used as working capital.' The Tribunal was justified in rejecting these claims. For bonus calculation, only the workmen's wage bill is relevant, not officers'.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Aluminium Corporation; Respondents: Their Workmen and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
14 August 1963
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeals / Appeals by Special Leave From the Awards of the Fifth Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal
Outcome
Appeals dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Industrial Dispute, Bonus, Full Bench Formula, Rehabilitation Charge, Return on Reserves Used as Working Capital, Evidentiary Value of Statements in Balance Sheets, Burden of Proof
Labour Law Industrial Law Industrial Dispute Bonus Full Bench Formula Rehabilitation Charge Return on Reserves Used as Working Capital Evidentiary Value of Statements in Balance Sheets +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Aluminium Corporation

Appellant

Their Workmen and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeals / Appeals by Special Leave From the Awards of the Fifth Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the employer is entitled to claim a prior charge under 'rehabilitation charge' without proper evidence
  2. 2 Whether statements in the balance sheet are sufficient evidence to establish reserves used as working capital
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal erred in not including officers in the wage bill for bonus calculation

Ratio Decidendi

The employer failed to prove, with proper evidence, its claims under both the 'rehabilitation charge' and 'return on reserves used as working capital.' The Tribunal was justified in rejecting these claims. For bonus calculation, only the workmen's wage bill is relevant, not officers'.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeals dismissed with costs
  • Award of bonus equivalent to three months' basic wages to workmen upheld