A.M. SANGAPPA @ SANGAPPA versus SANGONDEPPA & ANR.
The High Court failed to notice and advert to relevant aspects and did not follow the principles required under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC for regular first appeals, warranting remand for fresh disposal.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: A.M. Sangappa @ Sangappa; Respondent: Sangondeppa; Respondent: V.N. Raghupathy; Respondent: Lave Kumar Sharma
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Decree of High Court in Regular First Appeal No. 238 of 2004
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of; judgment of High Court set aside; matter remanded to High Court for fresh disposal.
- Legal Topics
- First Appeal, Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, Appellate Court Duties
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A.M. Sangappa @ Sangappa
Appellant
Sangondeppa
Respondent
V.N. Raghupathy
Respondent
Lave Kumar Sharma
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Decree of High Court in Regular First Appeal No. 238 of 2004
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court properly disposed of the regular first appeal in compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court failed to notice and advert to relevant aspects and did not follow the principles required under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC for regular first appeals, warranting remand for fresh disposal.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of; judgment of High Court set aside; matter remanded to High Court for fresh disposal.
Orders
- High Court to restore RFA No. 238 of 2004 (corrected as RFA Nos. 622-623 of 2007) on its file and make all endeavour for early disposal, preferably within six months from date of receipt of the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment