AMAR JYOTI STONE CRUSTING CO. versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
The appellant failed to establish title to mineral rights as it did not produce the necessary record-of-rights, nor was there any statutory presumption in its favor. The refusal of permit by the Collector was on valid grounds as the land was in a controlled area; subsequent statutory changes did not entitle appellant to mandamus as there was no live application pending.
- Parties
- Appellant: Amar Jyoti Stone Crushing Co.; Respondents: Union of India and Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 1961
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Mineral Rights, Quarry Permits, Presumption Under Land Revenue Act, Delhi Minor Mineral Rules, Mandamus
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amar Jyoti Stone Crushing Co.
Appellant
Union of India and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had title to mineral rights in the disputed land.
- 2 Whether refusal of permit to quarry was justified and if mandamus lies.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to establish title to mineral rights as it did not produce the necessary record-of-rights, nor was there any statutory presumption in its favor. The refusal of permit by the Collector was on valid grounds as the land was in a controlled area; subsequent statutory changes did not entitle appellant to mandamus as there was no live application pending.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant's suit for declaration and mandatory injunction dismissed.
- Appellant to pay costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment