AMAR KANT CHOUDHARY versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
Decisions of the Selection Committee were vitiated by reliance on adverse remarks not communicated in time or subsequently expunged. Denial of promotion on this basis is contrary to principles of natural justice, and the case must be reconsidered excluding such invalid entries.
- Parties
- Appellant: Amar Kant Choudhary; Respondents: State of Bihar & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 January 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Dismissal at the Admission Stage of Writ Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution by the Patna High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Promotion in Public Service, Natural Justice, Confidential Reports, Principles of Fair Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amar Kant Choudhary
Appellant
State of Bihar & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Dismissal at the Admission Stage of Writ Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution by the Patna High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether denial of promotion based on adverse confidential entries not communicated or subsequently expunged violates natural justice
- 2 Whether the decisions of the Selection Committee relying on such entries are valid
Ratio Decidendi
Decisions of the Selection Committee were vitiated by reliance on adverse remarks not communicated in time or subsequently expunged. Denial of promotion on this basis is contrary to principles of natural justice, and the case must be reconsidered excluding such invalid entries.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs.
Orders
- Order of the Patna High Court dismissing the writ petition set aside.
- Selection Committee to reconsider the appellant's case for promotion to the Indian Police Service Cadre of the State of Bihar as on December 22, 1976; if not selected then, to be considered as on March 12, 1981 or October 14, 1981, as appropriate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment