AMITABH SHRIVASTAVA versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
Since the minimum qualifying marks were reduced to 43% by executive order without statutory amendment, Rule 9 could not be applied at that stage, and the appellant who secured 43.6% should have been admitted in the reserved category for children of military personnel as per Rule 7.
- Parties
- Appellant: Amitabh Shrivastava; Respondents: State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order Dated 4.11.1980 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Writ Petition No. 167 of 1980
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Admission to Medical Colleges, Reservation of Seats, Minimum Qualifying Marks, Executive Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amitabh Shrivastava
Appellant
State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order Dated 4.11.1980 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Writ Petition No. 167 of 1980
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the reduction in minimum qualifying marks for admission to medical colleges in Madhya Pradesh should be applied to reserved categories after exhausting statutory relaxation and whether Rule 9 allows filling of vacant reserved seats through combined merit list when an executive order lowers qualifying marks further
Ratio Decidendi
Since the minimum qualifying marks were reduced to 43% by executive order without statutory amendment, Rule 9 could not be applied at that stage, and the appellant who secured 43.6% should have been admitted in the reserved category for children of military personnel as per Rule 7.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Appellant to be admitted to the M.B.B.S. course for the academic year 1981-82 in the reserved category for children of military personnel (Rule 7(3)(c))
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment