AMRIK SINGH versus THE STATE OF PEPSU.

AMRIK SINGH versus THE STATE OF PEPSU.

Sanction for prosecution under section 197(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is necessary when the acts complained of are directly connected with the official duties of a public servant and could reasonably be claimed as done by virtue of office. In this case, the acts in question were within the scope of the appellant's official duties. Absence of sanction is fatal to the prosecution.

Parties
Appellant: Amrik Singh; Respondent: The State of Pepsu
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
28 February 1955
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal by Special Leave / Supreme Court of India, Post High Court Conviction
Outcome
Appeal allowed; convictions and sentences set aside.
Legal Topics
Sanction for Prosecution, Criminal Misappropriation, Forgery, Scope of Official Duty

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amrik Singh

Appellant

The State of Pepsu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal by Special Leave / Supreme Court of India, Post High Court Conviction

  1. 1 Whether sanction under section 197(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is necessary for prosecuting a public servant under section 409 of the Indian Penal Code for criminal misappropriation.
  2. 2 Whether the acts complained of integrally relate to duties as a public servant.

Ratio Decidendi

Sanction for prosecution under section 197(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is necessary when the acts complained of are directly connected with the official duties of a public servant and could reasonably be claimed as done by virtue of office. In this case, the acts in question were within the scope of the appellant's official duties. Absence of sanction is fatal to the prosecution.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; convictions and sentences set aside.

Orders

  • Conviction and sentence of the appellant set aside.
  • Fine, if paid, will be refunded.