AMRIT LAL SOOD AND ANR. versus SMT. KAUSHALAYA DEVI THAPAR AND ORS.
Under a comprehensive vehicle insurance policy with an indemnification clause covering 'bodily injury to any person,' the insurer is liable to indemnify the insured for compensation claimed by a gratuitous passenger injured in an accident; the statutory exclusion does not bar contractual coverage unless the policy...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Amrit Lal Sood; Respondent: Smt. Kaushalaya Devi Thapar; Appellant: Chandra Bhushan Prasad; Respondent: Anis Ahmad Khan; Respondent: P.K. Seth; Respondent: S.K. Gupta; Respondent: S.C. Sharda; Respondent: R. Narayanan; Respondent: K.C. Dua
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Letters Patent Appeals, Himachal Pradesh High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Vehicle Insurance, Comprehensive Policy, Indemnification Clause, Liability of Insurer for Gratuitous Passenger, Compensation for Road Accident
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amrit Lal Sood
Appellant
Smt. Kaushalaya Devi Thapar
Respondent
Chandra Bhushan Prasad
Appellant
Anis Ahmad Khan
Respondent
P.K. Seth
Respondent
S.K. Gupta
Respondent
S.C. Sharda
Respondent
R. Narayanan
Respondent
K.C. Dua
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Letters Patent Appeals, Himachal Pradesh High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Is an insurer liable to pay compensation for injury to a gratuitous passenger under a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance policy?
- 2 Does the insurance policy cover risks wider than statutory minimum including gratuitous passengers?
Ratio Decidendi
Under a comprehensive vehicle insurance policy with an indemnification clause covering 'bodily injury to any person,' the insurer is liable to indemnify the insured for compensation claimed by a gratuitous passenger injured in an accident; the statutory exclusion does not bar contractual coverage unless the policy itself restricts it.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed
Orders
- Judgment of High Court exonerating insurer set aside
- Division Bench award enforceable against insurer (5th respondent)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment