AMRITSAR RA YON & SILK MILLS versus THEIR WORKMEN
The Tribunal was justified in framing a gratuity scheme given the financial position of the appellant. While the prescribed rate of gratuity (one month's basic wages for each year of service) was not fundamentally out of line with other schemes in the region, a ceiling of 15 months' basic wages should be imposed. Other details of the award remain unchanged.
- Parties
- Appellant: Amritsar Rayon & Silk Mills; Respondent: Their Workmen
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 1962
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Award Dated November 6, 1960, of the Industrial Tribunal, Punjab, in Reference No. 43 of 1958.
- Outcome
- Award modified.
- Legal Topics
- Industrial Disputes, Gratuity Scheme, Industrial Tribunal Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amritsar Rayon & Silk Mills
Appellant
Their Workmen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Award Dated November 6, 1960, of the Industrial Tribunal, Punjab, in Reference No. 43 of 1958.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a gratuity scheme should be framed for the employees.
- 2 Whether a ceiling should be placed on the amount of gratuity payable under the scheme.
- 3 Whether the rate of one month's basic wages per year of service is justified or excessive.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was justified in framing a gratuity scheme given the financial position of the appellant. While the prescribed rate of gratuity (one month's basic wages for each year of service) was not fundamentally out of line with other schemes in the region, a ceiling of 15 months' basic wages should be imposed. Other details of the award remain unchanged.
Court Disposition
Award modified.
Orders
- A ceiling of 15 months' basic wages is to be imposed on the total gratuity payable under the scheme.
- The rest of the award is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment