SIKANDER JEHAN BEGUM AND ANOTHER versus ANDHRA PRADESH STATE GOVERNMENT
Section 13(2) of the Hyderabad Atiyat Enquiries Act, 1952, does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(f) of the Constitution because succession to Atiyat Jagirs is not a legal right but subject to the discretion of the State, and classifying orders passed during the specified period does not constitute unconstitutional discrimination.
- Parties
- Petitioners/appellants: Sikander Jehan Begum and Another; Respondent: Andhra Pradesh State Government; Other Respondents: Respondents Nos. 8 to 13 (in the appeal) and 6 to 11 (in the petition)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 1961
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal and Writ Petition / Final Judgment on Constitutional Validity; Appeal Against High Court Decision and Writ Petition Under Article 32
- Outcome
- Writ petition and appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Validating Legislation, Enforceability of Fundamental Rights, Atiyat Jagir Succession, Civil Court Jurisdiction Exclusion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sikander Jehan Begum and Another
Petitioners/appellants
Andhra Pradesh State Government
Respondent
Respondents Nos. 8 to 13 (in the appeal) and 6 to 11 (in the petition)
Other Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal and Writ Petition / Final Judgment on Constitutional Validity; Appeal Against High Court Decision and Writ Petition Under Article 32
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 13(2) of the Hyderabad Atiyat Enquiries Act, 1952, violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(f) of the Constitution of India by barring recourse to civil courts for succession disputes in relation to Atiyat Jagirs and validating certain executive orders
Ratio Decidendi
Section 13(2) of the Hyderabad Atiyat Enquiries Act, 1952, does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(f) of the Constitution because succession to Atiyat Jagirs is not a legal right but subject to the discretion of the State, and classifying orders passed during the specified period does not constitute unconstitutional discrimination.
Court Disposition
Writ petition and appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Both the writ petition and the appeal fail and are dismissed with costs; one set of hearing costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment