ANIL KUMAR & ORS. versus M. K. AIYAPPA & ANR.

ANIL KUMAR & ORS. versus M. K. AIYAPPA & ANR.

A Magistrate/Special Judge cannot refer a private complaint for investigation under s.156(3) CrPC against a public servant without a valid previous sanction under s.19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and such sanction is a mandatory requirement even at the pre-cognizance stage.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Anil Kumar & Ors.; Respondent: M. K. Aiyappa & Anr.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
01 October 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Sanction for Prosecution of Public Servants, Powers of Magistrate Under S.156(3) Cr PC, Prevention of Corruption Act Application
Criminal Law Anti Corruption Sanction for Prosecution of Public Servants Powers of Magistrate Under S.156(3) Cr PC Prevention of Corruption Act Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anil Kumar & Ors.

Appellant

M. K. Aiyappa & Anr.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Special Judge/Magistrate can refer a private complaint under s.200 CrPC for investigation under s.156(3) CrPC against a public servant without previous sanction under s.19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

Ratio Decidendi

A Magistrate/Special Judge cannot refer a private complaint for investigation under s.156(3) CrPC against a public servant without a valid previous sanction under s.19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and such sanction is a mandatory requirement even at the pre-cognizance stage.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • No error found in the High Court's order; Special Judge's order and complaint quashed.