ANIL KUMAR & ORS. versus M. K. AIYAPPA & ANR.
A Magistrate/Special Judge cannot refer a private complaint for investigation under s.156(3) CrPC against a public servant without a valid previous sanction under s.19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and such sanction is a mandatory requirement even at the pre-cognizance stage.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Anil Kumar & Ors.; Respondent: M. K. Aiyappa & Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 01 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sanction for Prosecution of Public Servants, Powers of Magistrate Under S.156(3) Cr PC, Prevention of Corruption Act Application
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anil Kumar & Ors.
Appellant
M. K. Aiyappa & Anr.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Special Judge/Magistrate can refer a private complaint under s.200 CrPC for investigation under s.156(3) CrPC against a public servant without previous sanction under s.19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Ratio Decidendi
A Magistrate/Special Judge cannot refer a private complaint for investigation under s.156(3) CrPC against a public servant without a valid previous sanction under s.19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and such sanction is a mandatory requirement even at the pre-cognizance stage.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- No error found in the High Court's order; Special Judge's order and complaint quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment