ANIL KUMAR versus STATE OF PUNJAB

ANIL KUMAR versus STATE OF PUNJAB

Court deemed it appropriate, considering the nature of the offences and facts, to direct sentences imposed in FIR No.37 and Complaint No.638 to run concurrently, except the fine and default sentences, which remain consecutive.

Parties
Appellant: Anil Kumar; Respondent: State of Punjab
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
17 January 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Order of Punjab and Haryana High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Concurrent Sentences, Discretion Under Section 427 Cr PC, NDPS Act, Drugs and Cosmetics Act
Criminal Law Concurrent Sentences Discretion Under Section 427 Cr PC NDPS Act Drugs and Cosmetics Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anil Kumar

Appellant

State of Punjab

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Order of Punjab and Haryana High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's sentences in two convictions should run concurrently under Section 427 CrPC

Ratio Decidendi

Court deemed it appropriate, considering the nature of the offences and facts, to direct sentences imposed in FIR No.37 and Complaint No.638 to run concurrently, except the fine and default sentences, which remain consecutive.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Substantive sentences imposed in FIR No.37 and Complaint No.638 to run concurrently
  • Fine amount and default sentences maintained; default sentence will run consecutively unless fine paid