CHANDRA SHASHI versus ANIL KUMAR VERMA
Filing a forged and fabricated document with intent to deceive the Court constitutes criminal contempt under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; an unconditional apology after discovery of wrongdoing, without real contrition, cannot absolve the contemner.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Chandra Shashi; Respondent: Anil Kumar Verma; Respondent: M.D. Adkar; Respondent: A.K. Verma; Respondent: Ejaz Maqbool
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Suo Motu Contempt / Final Disposition
- Outcome
- Contemner found guilty of criminal contempt; petition disposed of.
- Legal Topics
- Criminal Contempt, Forged and Fabricated Documents, Administration of Justice, Apology in Contempt Proceedings, Mens Rea
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chandra Shashi
Petitioner
Anil Kumar Verma
Respondent
M.D. Adkar
Respondent
A.K. Verma
Respondent
Ejaz Maqbool
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Suo Motu Contempt / Final Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether filing of a forged and fabricated document in Court with intention to defraud amounts to contempt of court under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
- 2 Whether an unconditional apology can be accepted to purge the guilt in contempt proceedings due to filing of such documents.
Ratio Decidendi
Filing a forged and fabricated document with intent to deceive the Court constitutes criminal contempt under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; an unconditional apology after discovery of wrongdoing, without real contrition, cannot absolve the contemner.
Court Disposition
Contemner found guilty of criminal contempt; petition disposed of.
Orders
- Offer of unconditional apology rejected.
- Sentence of two weeks' imprisonment awarded to contemner Anil Kumar Verma.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment