ANIL VASUDEV SALGAONKAR versus NARESH KUSHALI SHIGAONKAR
An election petition must include material facts disclosing a complete cause of action; absence of material facts relating to alleged corrupt practices, or failure to plead them, is fatal and mandates dismissal under Section 83(1)(a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and Order 7 Rule 11(a) CPC.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Anil Vasudev Salgaonkar; Respondent: Naresh Kushali Shigaonkar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From a High Court Decision in Election Petition
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; election petition dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Election Petition, Corrupt Practices, Material Facts in Pleadings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anil Vasudev Salgaonkar
Appellant
Naresh Kushali Shigaonkar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From a High Court Decision in Election Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the election petition contained material facts constituting corrupt practices under Representation of the People Act, 1951
- 2 Whether the election petition disclosed a complete cause of action
- 3 Whether failure to plead material facts warranted dismissal of the petition
Ratio Decidendi
An election petition must include material facts disclosing a complete cause of action; absence of material facts relating to alleged corrupt practices, or failure to plead them, is fatal and mandates dismissal under Section 83(1)(a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and Order 7 Rule 11(a) CPC.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; election petition dismissed.
Orders
- Each party to bear own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment