ARUN KUMAR NAYAK versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ARUN KUMAR NAYAK versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Selection process limited to candidates from Employment Exchange was a mockery; fair selection required consideration of all applicants both from Employment Exchange and public notification, in line with principles of justice, fair play and equal opportunity.

Parties
Appellant: Arun Kumar Nayak; Respondents: Union of India and Ors.; Respondent No.4: Sri Chittaranjan Kar
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
20 September 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal No. 2262 of 2005 / Appeal Against High Court Judgment Overturning Tribunal Order
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; Tribunal order restored; selection process to include all candidates from both Employment Exchange and public notification.
Legal Topics
Recruitment Process, Employment Exchange, Public Notification, Reservation Policy, Selection Procedure
Service Law Recruitment Process Employment Exchange Public Notification Reservation Policy Selection Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Arun Kumar Nayak

Appellant

Union of India and Ors.

Respondents

Sri Chittaranjan Kar

Respondent No.4

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal No. 2262 of 2005 / Appeal Against High Court Judgment Overturning Tribunal Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether recruitment to the post of Extra Departmental Sub Post Master (EDSPM) must consider candidates from both Employment Exchange and public notification.
  2. 2 Whether selection process limited to Employment Exchange candidates ignores principles of fair play and equal opportunity.
  3. 3 Whether ignoring OBC and SC candidates in favour of a general category candidate was valid.

Ratio Decidendi

Selection process limited to candidates from Employment Exchange was a mockery; fair selection required consideration of all applicants both from Employment Exchange and public notification, in line with principles of justice, fair play and equal opportunity.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; Tribunal order restored; selection process to include all candidates from both Employment Exchange and public notification.

Orders

  • Set aside High Court order dated 13.02.2003 in OJC No.6122 of 2000.
  • Dismissed writ petition filed by respondent No.4.