ARVIND MOHAN JOHARI AND ANR. versus STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.
The appellants misled the Supreme Court regarding the existence of assets with the Stock Exchanges; as no such money was admitted to be lying with the Exchanges, the original basis for granting bail was false, warranting recall of the bail order.
- Parties
- Appellant: Arvind Mohan Johari; Appellant: Anand Krishna Johari; Respondent: State of U.P.; Applicant: Bombay Stock Exchange; Applicant: National Stock Exchange
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Miscellaneous Petition / Bail Cancellation; Recall/clarification of Bail Order
- Outcome
- Bail order recalled; appellants directed to surrender within one week; applications disposed of
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Misrepresentation, Stock Exchanges, Asset Recovery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arvind Mohan Johari
Appellant
Anand Krishna Johari
Appellant
State of U.P.
Respondent
Bombay Stock Exchange
Applicant
National Stock Exchange
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition / Bail Cancellation; Recall/clarification of Bail Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants misled the Supreme Court regarding amounts lying in their credit with Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange
- 2 Whether the bail order should be recalled due to misrepresentation
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants misled the Supreme Court regarding the existence of assets with the Stock Exchanges; as no such money was admitted to be lying with the Exchanges, the original basis for granting bail was false, warranting recall of the bail order.
Court Disposition
Bail order recalled; appellants directed to surrender within one week; applications disposed of
Orders
- Appellants Arvind Mohan Johari and Anand Krishna Johari are directed to surrender before the Trial Court within one week and may be taken into custody.
- If and when the disputes between Stock Exchanges and appellants are adjudicated such that appellants can repay outstanding dues to claimants, they may apply for bail afresh.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment