ARVIND @ PAPPU versus STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION)

ARVIND @ PAPPU versus STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION)

The prosecution established a consistent and complete chain of circumstances—past enmity, lure of employment, being last seen together, finding of the body in circumstances implicating the accused, and his prolonged absconding—which points only to the conclusion of the appellant's guilt, fully satisfying the legal standard for conviction in a case based on circumstantial evidence.

Parties
Appellant: Arvind @ Pappu; Respondent: State (Delhi Administration)
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
10 May 1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Decision Affirming Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC affirmed.
Legal Topics
Murder, Circumstantial Evidence, Section 302 IPC
Criminal Law Murder Circumstantial Evidence Section 302 IPC

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Arvind @ Pappu

Appellant

State (Delhi Administration)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Decision Affirming Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction of the appellant for murder under Section 302 IPC based entirely on circumstantial evidence was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution established a consistent and complete chain of circumstances—past enmity, lure of employment, being last seen together, finding of the body in circumstances implicating the accused, and his prolonged absconding—which points only to the conclusion of the appellant's guilt, fully satisfying the legal standard for conviction in a case based on circumstantial evidence.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC affirmed.