ASHARAFI SINGH versus KAPILDEO RAI (DEAD) AND ORS
The Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 is applicable to the land in question since its definition of land is very wide and the transfer after notification is subject to the rights and liabilities under the consolidation scheme. There is no legal infirmity in the High Court's order affirming this position.
- Parties
- Appellant: Asharafi Singh; Respondents: Kapildeo Rai (Dead) and Ors
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, Definition of Land, Transfer of Land Post Consolidation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Asharafi Singh
Appellant
Kapildeo Rai (Dead) and Ors
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench Judgment of High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 applies to land within jurisdiction of Patna Regional Development Authority purchased after notification and completion of consolidation proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 is applicable to the land in question since its definition of land is very wide and the transfer after notification is subject to the rights and liabilities under the consolidation scheme. There is no legal infirmity in the High Court's order affirming this position.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment