ASHARFI LAL & SONS versus STATE OF U.P.

ASHARFI LAL & SONS versus STATE OF U.P.

The Court held that the case fell within the 'rarest of the rare' category as articulated in Bachan Singh and Machhi Singh, and that the duty to impose appropriate punishment and the deterrent and social necessity justified confirmation of the death sentences for the two principal appellants while upholding the convictions and sentences of the others.

Parties
Appellant: Asharfi Lal; Appellant: Babu; Appellant: Ganga Prasad; Appellant: Hemraj; Appellant: Mata Badal; Respondent: State of U.P.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
30 March 1987
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; death sentences and other sentences affirmed
Legal Topics
Murder, Sentencing Principles, Capital Punishment, Criminal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Asharfi Lal

Appellant

Babu

Appellant

Ganga Prasad

Appellant

Hemraj

Appellant

Mata Badal

Appellant

State of U.P.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court Final Judgment

  1. 1 criminal appeal evidentiary review
  2. 2 sentencing principles
  3. 3 application of 'rarest of the rare' doctrine

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the case fell within the 'rarest of the rare' category as articulated in Bachan Singh and Machhi Singh, and that the duty to impose appropriate punishment and the deterrent and social necessity justified confirmation of the death sentences for the two principal appellants while upholding the convictions and sentences of the others.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; death sentences and other sentences affirmed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Death sentence of Asharfi Lal and Babu confirmed