ASHOK KUMAR SONKAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ASHOK KUMAR SONKAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Appointment of appellant was illegal as he did not possess essential educational qualification by the cut-off date, and powers exercised by Visitor to annul appointment were valid; principles of natural justice need not be mechanically applied when the outcome would not change; equity jurisdiction does not apply to illegal appointments.

Parties
Appellant: Ashok Kumar Sonkar; Respondent: Union of India; Respondent: Respondent No. 4
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
23 February 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposition of Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appointment Procedures, Educational Qualifications, University Governance, Natural Justice, Equity Jurisdiction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ashok Kumar Sonkar

Appellant

Union of India

Respondent

Respondent No. 4

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Disposition of Appeal From High Court Judgment

  1. 1 What is the cut-off date for possession of requisite educational qualifications in university appointments?
  2. 2 Extent of Visitor's power to annul university proceedings under Banaras Hindu University Act, 1915
  3. 3 Application of principles of natural justice and futility exception

Ratio Decidendi

Appointment of appellant was illegal as he did not possess essential educational qualification by the cut-off date, and powers exercised by Visitor to annul appointment were valid; principles of natural justice need not be mechanically applied when the outcome would not change; equity jurisdiction does not apply to illegal appointments.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs