ASHOK SINGH versus ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, CALCUTTA AND OTHERS
Proceedings for levy or assessment of estate duty cannot be commenced after expiry of five years from the date of death as barred by Section 73A of Estate Duty Act. Consequently, production of a certificate from the Controller under Section 56 becomes an impossible compliance in such cases. The statutory bar is comprehensive and includes succession certificate proceedings; harmonious construction between Sections 56 and 73A must uphold the limitation.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ashok Singh; Respondents: Assistant Controller of Estate Duty, Calcutta and Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment After Appeal From Calcutta High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation on Estate Duty Proceedings, Succession Certificates, Interpretation of Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ashok Singh
Appellant
Assistant Controller of Estate Duty, Calcutta and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment After Appeal From Calcutta High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings for levy of estate duty are barred if not commenced within five years from death as per Section 73A of Estate Duty Act, 1953
- 2 Whether production of certificate from Estate Duty Controller is required where limitation under Section 73A has expired
- 3 Whether the meaning of ‘levy’ in Section 73A includes proceedings for assessment
Ratio Decidendi
Proceedings for levy or assessment of estate duty cannot be commenced after expiry of five years from the date of death as barred by Section 73A of Estate Duty Act. Consequently, production of a certificate from the Controller under Section 56 becomes an impossible compliance in such cases. The statutory bar is comprehensive and includes succession certificate proceedings; harmonious construction between Sections 56 and 73A must uphold the limitation.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned judgment of Calcutta High Court set aside
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment