India Judgment

SEEMA v ASHWANI KUMAR

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

01

Holding and result

In the absence of statutory prescription for recording/registering marriages, executive instructions can be issued and made enforceable to maintain records, until suitable legislation is enacted.

Court disposition

Notice issued; interim stay granted

Orders

  • Issue notice
  • Issue notice on the application for ex-parte stay
  • Interim stay of proceedings in Matrimonial Suit No. 104 of 2004 pending before Addl. District Judge, Delhi

02

Material facts

Parties

Seema

Petitioner Counsel: Balraj Dewan

Ashwani Kumar

Respondent

Ranjit Kumar

Senior Advocate, Assisting

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Transfer Petition (civil) / Interim Order; Notice Issued

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Problems arise due to absence of records relating to dates of marriages and parties to the marriage, causing far-reaching consequences. Suggests State Governments consider issuing executive instructions to authorise officials to keep records.
Respondent
Learned Solicitor General submits there may be necessity of suitable legislation as Government Orders/executive instructions may not be sufficient.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Supreme Court Order

    Until legislation is made, Government Orders/executive instructions can be made enforceable in terms of Supreme Court orders and implemented where there is no statutory prescription for recording/registering the marriage.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

In the absence of statutory prescription for recording/registering marriages, executive instructions can be issued and made enforceable to maintain records, until suitable legislation is enacted.

Obiter and limits

  • Request for State Governments and Union Territories to place their views for appropriate directions

Court disposition

Notice issued; interim stay granted

  • Issue notice
  • Issue notice on the application for ex-parte stay
  • Interim stay of proceedings in Matrimonial Suit No. 104 of 2004 pending before Addl. District Judge, Delhi

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Court record

Judgment

Judgment

SEEMA v.

ASHW ANI KUMAR

APRIL 15, 2005

[ARIJIT PASAYAT ANO S.H. KAPADIA, JJ.)

A

B

Family Law:

Record of marriages-Dates of marriages and parties to marriage Record of-To be kept by official to be auhorised by State Government- C Necessity of Legislation-Court suggesting State Governments to consider issuing of executive instructions which may be made enforceable in terms of orders of Supreme Court, till suitable legislation in this regard is made Legislation-Necessity of-Suggested

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Transfer Petition (C) No. 29 I of D

2005.

Balraj Dewan for the Petitioner.

The following Proceeding/Order of the Court was delivered :

ORDER

Issue notice.

Issue notice on the application for ex-parte stay also.

There shall be interim stay of proceedings in Matrimonial Suit No. 104 of 2004 entitled Ashwani Kumar v. Seema, pending before Learned Addi. District Judge, Delhi.

E

F

During the hearing of this petition, it appeared to us that in the absence of records relating to dates of marriages and parties to the marriage, problems. G come up which have far-reaching consequences. We, therefore, request learned Solicitor General to consider whether Government orders by way of executive instructins can be issued, on the basis of directions of this Court, to various States and Union Territories to authorise officials specifically to keep record

649.

H

650

SUPREME COURT REPORTS

[2005) 3 S.C.R.

A of marriages so that they can be placed as evidence in different proceedings if the necessity arises. Learned Solicitor General submitted that there may be necessity of a suitable legislation in this regard as the Government Orders/ executive instructions may not suffer. We are of the view that until a suitable legislation is made, the Government Order/executive instructions can. be made B enforceable in terms of the orders of this Court. These may be implemented where there is no statutory prescription for recording/registering the marriage, and may be done as an additional measure when there is any such prescription.

We have also requested Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. to assist us in this matter. If learned Solicitor General feels and if so advised, he may require C the State Governments regard and the Union Territories to place their views in this regard before him and this Court so that appropriate directions can be issued. A copy of our order be handed over to learned Solicitor General and Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. for necessary steps in this matter.

R.P.

Notice issued.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.