ASHWINI KUMAR SHARMA versus YADUVANSH SINGH AND ORS.

ASHWINI KUMAR SHARMA versus YADUVANSH SINGH AND ORS.

An election petition challenging the counting of votes need only contain a concise statement of material facts under Section 83(1)(a); evidence and material particulars may be supplied later. The petition cannot be dismissed in limine for lack of material particulars where the material facts are sufficiently pleaded.

Parties
Appellant: ASHWINI KUMAR SHARMA; Respondent: Y ADUVANSH SINGH
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
01 December 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Decision Dismissing Election Petition as Not Maintainable
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Maintainability of Election Petition, Requirement of Material Facts in Pleadings, Irregularities in Counting of Votes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ASHWINI KUMAR SHARMA

Appellant

Y ADUVANSH SINGH

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Decision Dismissing Election Petition as Not Maintainable

  1. 1 Whether the election petition discloses a cause of action by containing a concise statement of material facts as required under Section 83(1)(a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951
  2. 2 Whether the failure to provide material particulars renders the petition not maintainable

Ratio Decidendi

An election petition challenging the counting of votes need only contain a concise statement of material facts under Section 83(1)(a); evidence and material particulars may be supplied later. The petition cannot be dismissed in limine for lack of material particulars where the material facts are sufficiently pleaded.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Impugned order of the High Court set aside
  • Election petition restored for disposal on merits