ASHWINI KUMAR SHARMA versus YADUVANSH SINGH AND ORS.
An election petition challenging the counting of votes need only contain a concise statement of material facts under Section 83(1)(a); evidence and material particulars may be supplied later. The petition cannot be dismissed in limine for lack of material particulars where the material facts are sufficiently pleaded.
- Parties
- Appellant: ASHWINI KUMAR SHARMA; Respondent: Y ADUVANSH SINGH
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Decision Dismissing Election Petition as Not Maintainable
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Maintainability of Election Petition, Requirement of Material Facts in Pleadings, Irregularities in Counting of Votes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ASHWINI KUMAR SHARMA
Appellant
Y ADUVANSH SINGH
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Decision Dismissing Election Petition as Not Maintainable
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the election petition discloses a cause of action by containing a concise statement of material facts as required under Section 83(1)(a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951
- 2 Whether the failure to provide material particulars renders the petition not maintainable
Ratio Decidendi
An election petition challenging the counting of votes need only contain a concise statement of material facts under Section 83(1)(a); evidence and material particulars may be supplied later. The petition cannot be dismissed in limine for lack of material particulars where the material facts are sufficiently pleaded.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned order of the High Court set aside
- Election petition restored for disposal on merits
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment