ASPI JAL & ANR. versus KHUSHROO RUSTOM DADYBURJOR
Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is not attracted unless the entire subject matter of both suits is the same. As the ground of non-user in earlier suits and the third suit relates to different periods, the suits are based on distinct causes, so Section 10 CPC does not bar the proceeding in the third suit.
- Parties
- Appellant: Aspi Jal; Respondent: Khushroo Rustom Dadyburjor
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Bombay High Court's Order Affirming Stay of Proceedings by Court of Small Causes, Mumbai
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Section 10 CPC Stay of Suit, Eviction on Ground of Non User, Res Judicata
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aspi Jal
Appellant
Khushroo Rustom Dadyburjor
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Bombay High Court's Order Affirming Stay of Proceedings by Court of Small Causes, Mumbai
Legal Issues
- 1 Is Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 applicable when only some matters in issue are common between two suits?
- 2 Does Section 10 CPC require the entire subject matter to be the same for a stay of proceedings?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is not attracted unless the entire subject matter of both suits is the same. As the ground of non-user in earlier suits and the third suit relates to different periods, the suits are based on distinct causes, so Section 10 CPC does not bar the proceeding in the third suit.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The impugned order of the trial court as affirmed by the High Court is set aside.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment