ASSOCIATE BUILDERS versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

ASSOCIATE BUILDERS versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

A Division Bench under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot set aside an arbitral award based on errors of fact or what it considers just on the facts; its scope is limited to statutory grounds, primarily whether award is in conflict with public policy as strictly defined. As none of the grounds for setting aside the award were established, and there was no duplication or overlapping of claims, the arbitral award (as upheld by the Single Judge) stands restored.

Parties
Appellant: Associate Builders; Respondent: Delhi Development Authority
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
25 November 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Division Bench of Delhi High Court, Following Arbitration Award and Single Judge Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; Division Bench judgment set aside, Single Judge judgment and arbitral award upheld
Legal Topics
Arbitral Awards, Public Policy, Judicial Intervention in Arbitration, Patent Illegality
Arbitration Contract Law Arbitral Awards Public Policy Judicial Intervention in Arbitration Patent Illegality

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Associate Builders

Appellant

Delhi Development Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Division Bench of Delhi High Court, Following Arbitration Award and Single Judge Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Scope of judicial intervention under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  2. 2 Meaning and application of 'public policy' in arbitration
  3. 3 Application of Hudson’s formula in computation of damages

Ratio Decidendi

A Division Bench under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot set aside an arbitral award based on errors of fact or what it considers just on the facts; its scope is limited to statutory grounds, primarily whether award is in conflict with public policy as strictly defined. As none of the grounds for setting aside the award were established, and there was no duplication or overlapping of claims, the arbitral award (as upheld by the Single Judge) stands restored.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; Division Bench judgment set aside, Single Judge judgment and arbitral award upheld

Orders

  • Judgment of Division Bench of Delhi High Court set aside
  • Judgment of Single Judge of Delhi High Court upheld