PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PATIALA & ORS. versus ATMA SINGH GREWAL

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PATIALA & ORS. versus ATMA SINGH GREWAL

The appeal was frivolous as the departmental enquiry was initiated in contravention of the second proviso to Rule 2.2(B), Punjab Civil Service Rules, being time-barred and after the respondent’s retirement. High Court’s direction to impose and recover costs from the officer who authorised the frivolous appeal is upheld to ensure personal accountability and deter such conduct by government officials.

Parties
Petitioner: Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. Patiala & Ors.; Respondent: Atma Singh Grewal
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
17 September 2013
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) No. 29589 of 2009 / Supreme Court: Decision on SLP
Outcome
Special Leave Petition dismissed with further costs.
Legal Topics
Frivolous Litigation, Imposition and Recovery of Costs, Departmental Enquiry Post Retirement, Voluntary Retirement, National Litigation Policy
Administrative Law Government Litigation Service Law Frivolous Litigation Imposition and Recovery of Costs Departmental Enquiry Post Retirement Voluntary Retirement National Litigation Policy

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. Patiala & Ors.

Petitioner

Atma Singh Grewal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) No. 29589 of 2009 / Supreme Court: Decision on SLP

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether departmental proceedings initiated after retirement and after the prescribed period are valid under Punjab Civil Service Rules r. 2.2(B), second proviso.
  2. 2 Whether costs imposed on the State Power Corporation for filing a frivolous appeal can be recovered from the officer who authorised the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was frivolous as the departmental enquiry was initiated in contravention of the second proviso to Rule 2.2(B), Punjab Civil Service Rules, being time-barred and after the respondent’s retirement. High Court’s direction to impose and recover costs from the officer who authorised the frivolous appeal is upheld to ensure personal accountability and deter such conduct by government officials.

Court Disposition

Special Leave Petition dismissed with further costs.

Orders

  • SLP dismissed with further costs of Rs. 10,000/- to be recovered from the officer who authorised the filing of the instant appeal, as directed by the High Court.
  • Costs to be deposited with the Legal Services Authority, Punjab within one month; recovery from the concerned officer within a further period of two months.