AVINASH DHAVAJI NAIK versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
In absence of sale instances, with agricultural character and lack of development, compensation for large tract acquired should be determined using the belting method; Rs.10/- per sq.m. is appropriate, considering both potentiality and developed case law guidelines.
- Parties
- Appellant: Avinash Dhavaji Naik; Respondent: State of Maharashtra
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Compensation Computation, Belting Method, Market Value Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Avinash Dhavaji Naik
Appellant
State of Maharashtra
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, considering absence of sale instances and agricultural nature?
- 2 Whether belting method and expert valuation evidence should be accepted in determining compensation?
Ratio Decidendi
In absence of sale instances, with agricultural character and lack of development, compensation for large tract acquired should be determined using the belting method; Rs.10/- per sq.m. is appropriate, considering both potentiality and developed case law guidelines.
Court Disposition
Appeals partly allowed
Orders
- Compensation fixed at Rs.10/- per sq.m. for lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment