AZMAT AZIM KHAN versus BOARD OF REVENUE, UTTAR PRADESH, ALLAHABAD & ORS.
By reason of Sections 23A and 23B of the U.P. Encumbered Estates Act, 1934 and Section 70 of the U.P. Abolition of Zamindari and Land Reforms Act, 1950, the Collector is to utilise compensation and rehabilitation bonds received for liquidation of secured debts; the Board of Revenue was correct in directing the stoppage of payment on the bonds and directing the Compensation Officer to hand over the bonds for liquidation of debts, and judgment-debtor was not entitled to the bonds without satisfying the decree.
- Parties
- Appellant: Azmat Azim Khan; Respondents: Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad & Ors.; Decree Holder (respondent No. 3): Raja Shatranjai
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 1971
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Certificate From Allahabad High Court, Decision Dated 15 January 1965
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Compensation Bonds, Zamindari Abolition, Execution of Decrees, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Azmat Azim Khan
Appellant
Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad & Ors.
Respondents
Raja Shatranjai
Decree Holder (respondent No. 3)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Certificate From Allahabad High Court, Decision Dated 15 January 1965
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, had authority to issue directions regarding compensation bonds payable to an intermediary for liquidation of decree under the U.P. Encumbered Estates Act, 1934 after the coming into force of the U.P. Abolition of Zamindari and Land Reforms Act, 1950
Ratio Decidendi
By reason of Sections 23A and 23B of the U.P. Encumbered Estates Act, 1934 and Section 70 of the U.P. Abolition of Zamindari and Land Reforms Act, 1950, the Collector is to utilise compensation and rehabilitation bonds received for liquidation of secured debts; the Board of Revenue was correct in directing the stoppage of payment on the bonds and directing the Compensation Officer to hand over the bonds for liquidation of debts, and judgment-debtor was not entitled to the bonds without satisfying the decree.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Directions of the Board of Revenue regarding stoppage of payment on the bonds and handing over bonds for liquidation of debts upheld
- Each party to bear their own costs in the Supreme Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment