B. M. RAMASWAMY versus B. M. KRISHNAMURTHY AND OTHERS
As the appellant's name was in the list of voters, he was qualified to be elected; alleged illegal inclusion could not be challenged in civil court, and the election could not be set aside on that ground.
- Parties
- Appellant: B. M. Ramaswamy; Respondent: B. M. Krishnamurthy; Respondents: Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 1962
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Mysore High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Electoral Roll, Improper Acceptance of Nominations, Jurisdiction of Civil Courts in Election Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B. M. Ramaswamy
Appellant
B. M. Krishnamurthy
Respondent
Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Mysore High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the inclusion of appellant's name in the electoral roll, though allegedly illegal, could result in setting aside the election by the civil court
- 2 Whether the civil court has jurisdiction to question the actions of the Electoral Registration Officer under the Representation of the People Act, 1950
- 3 Whether improper acceptance of nomination exists when the name is in the list of voters, even if included illegally
Ratio Decidendi
As the appellant's name was in the list of voters, he was qualified to be elected; alleged illegal inclusion could not be challenged in civil court, and the election could not be set aside on that ground.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed.
Orders
- The election petition is dismissed with costs throughout.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment