B. NAGABHUSHANAM versus STATE OF KARNATAKA
There was a concurrent finding of rash and negligent driving based on eyewitness accounts and physical evidence. The sentence imposed by the High Court (six months' simple imprisonment and fine for Section 304A IPC, with alternative imprisonment in default and a direction to pay compensation from the fine) is not shocking and requires no interference.
- Parties
- Appellant: B. Nagabhushanam; Respondent: State of Karnataka
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against High Court Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rash and Negligent Driving, Causing Death by Negligence, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B. Nagabhushanam
Appellant
State of Karnataka
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the appellant for offences under Sections 279 and 304A IPC was appropriate
- 2 Whether a case of rash and negligent driving is made out on the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
There was a concurrent finding of rash and negligent driving based on eyewitness accounts and physical evidence. The sentence imposed by the High Court (six months' simple imprisonment and fine for Section 304A IPC, with alternative imprisonment in default and a direction to pay compensation from the fine) is not shocking and requires no interference.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant to undergo six months' simple imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs.5000/- under Section 304A IPC; in default, simple imprisonment for one month.
- Out of Rs.5000/-, Rs.4000/- to be paid to P.W.6 Gowramma, Rs.1000/- to State exchequer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment