BABU SINGH & ORS. versus RAM SAHAI @ RAM SINGH
Section 69 Evidence Act can be invoked only if attesting witnesses cannot be found after exhausting all possible steps to compel their attendance; mere statement by counsel or party is not sufficient. Will not proved according to law, so Section 69 does not apply in this case.
- Parties
- Appellant: Babu Singh & Ors.; Respondent: Ram Sahai @ Ram Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in R.s.a. No. 3595/2002
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Proof of Will, Attestation, Section 68 and 69 Evidence Act, Section 63 Indian Succession Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Babu Singh & Ors.
Appellant
Ram Sahai @ Ram Singh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in R.s.a. No. 3595/2002
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Section 69 of the Evidence Act, 1872 applies when attesting witnesses are not examined
- 2 What is the mode of proof for execution and attestation of a will under Section 68 and 69 of the Evidence Act
Ratio Decidendi
Section 69 Evidence Act can be invoked only if attesting witnesses cannot be found after exhausting all possible steps to compel their attendance; mere statement by counsel or party is not sufficient. Will not proved according to law, so Section 69 does not apply in this case.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned judgments of High Court and First Appellate Court set aside
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment