BAKHTAWAR SINGH AND ANR. versus SADA KAUR AND ANR.
Plaintiffs failed to produce evidence that withdrawal of earlier suit was granted for a formal defect or sufficient grounds for institution of fresh suit as required under Order 23 Rule 1(3) CPC. Plaintiffs also failed to show a defect of jurisdiction or other cause for application of Section 14 Limitation Act. Consequently, the fresh suit was barred by limitation and respondent had perfected title by adverse possession.
- Parties
- Appellant: Bakhtawar Singh; Respondent: Sada Kaur
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment of Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Limitation, Withdrawal of Suit, Code of Civil Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bakhtawar Singh
Appellant
Sada Kaur
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment of Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiffs were entitled to exclude the time spent in prosecuting the earlier suit under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 after withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh suit
- 2 Whether permission to withdraw the suit in accordance with Order 23 Rule 1(3) CPC was granted
- 3 Whether the fresh suit was barred by limitation
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiffs failed to produce evidence that withdrawal of earlier suit was granted for a formal defect or sufficient grounds for institution of fresh suit as required under Order 23 Rule 1(3) CPC. Plaintiffs also failed to show a defect of jurisdiction or other cause for application of Section 14 Limitation Act. Consequently, the fresh suit was barred by limitation and respondent had perfected title by adverse possession.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment