BALBIR KAUR AND ANR. versus STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. AND ORS.

BALBIR KAUR AND ANR. versus STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. AND ORS.

The NJCS Tripartite Agreement of 1989 expressly preserves earlier circulars pertaining to compassionate appointment. The Family Benefit Scheme cannot be equated with compassionate appointment benefits and cannot override statutory mandates for lump-sum payment of provident fund and gratuity. Compassionate...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Balbir Kaur; Appellant: Balbir Kaur (second appellant); Respondent: Steel Authority of India Ltd.; Respondent: Ors.; Appellant: Smt. T.K. Meenakshi
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
05 May 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision
Outcome
Appeals allowed; High Court order set aside.
Legal Topics
Compassionate Appointment, Family Benefit Scheme, Tripartite Agreements, Employees Provident Fund, Payment of Gratuity
Service Law Labour Law Constitutional Law Compassionate Appointment Family Benefit Scheme Tripartite Agreements Employees Provident Fund Payment of Gratuity

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Balbir Kaur

Appellant

Balbir Kaur (second appellant)

Appellant

Steel Authority of India Ltd.

Respondent

Ors.

Respondent

Smt. T.K. Meenakshi

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the introduction of the Family Benefit Scheme under the NJCS Tripartite Agreement of 1989 overrides the right to compassionate appointment provided under earlier agreements and circulars
  2. 2 Whether compulsory deposit of provident fund and gratuity amounts for the Family Benefit Scheme is contrary to statutory provisions of Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972

Ratio Decidendi

The NJCS Tripartite Agreement of 1989 expressly preserves earlier circulars pertaining to compassionate appointment. The Family Benefit Scheme cannot be equated with compassionate appointment benefits and cannot override statutory mandates for lump-sum payment of provident fund and gratuity. Compassionate appointment is supported by constitutional obligations of social and economic justice. Employer must consider dependants for compassionate appointment.

Court Disposition

Appeals allowed; High Court order set aside.

Orders

  • Steel Authority of India Ltd. is directed to consider the cases of compassionate appointments insofar as appellants are concerned.
  • No order as to costs.