PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK versus VIRENDER KUMAR GOEL AND ORS.
Withdrawal and utilisation of benefits under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme constitute acceptance of the Scheme. Employees who have not withdrawn or utilised the unilaterally deposited benefits, after withdrawal of their VRS application, have not accepted the Scheme. Such employees are entitled to reinstatement with continuity in service, back wages, and all consequential benefits, subject to refund of the deposited amount with interest.
- Parties
- Petitioner/appellant: Punjab National Bank; Respondent: Virender Kumar Goel; Applicant: Balbir Singh Chadha; Applicant: Narinder Singh; Applicant: Mohinder Pal Singh; Applicant: State Bank of Patiala
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Review Petition (c) No. 53 of 2003 Arising Out of Civil Appeal No. 896 of 2002 / Clarification/modification and Review of Supreme Court Judgment Dated 17.12.2002
- Outcome
- Petitions disposed of; Review Petition No. 53 of 2003 allowed; I.A. Nos. 1, 2, and 3 of 2003 allowed; I.A. Nos. 1-22 of 2003 allowed; I.A. Nos. 14 and 15 of 2003 dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Voluntary Retirement Scheme, Employment Contract, Withdrawal of Retirement Benefits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Punjab National Bank
Petitioner/appellant
Virender Kumar Goel
Respondent
Balbir Singh Chadha
Applicant
Narinder Singh
Applicant
Mohinder Pal Singh
Applicant
State Bank of Patiala
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Review Petition (c) No. 53 of 2003 Arising Out of Civil Appeal No. 896 of 2002 / Clarification/modification and Review of Supreme Court Judgment Dated 17.12.2002
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether withdrawal and utilisation of benefits under Voluntary Retirement Scheme constitutes acceptance of the Scheme
- 2 Clarification of Supreme Court directions regarding acceptance of VRS benefits
- 3 Eligibility of reinstatement with continuity in service and back wages after unilateral deposit by the bank
Ratio Decidendi
Withdrawal and utilisation of benefits under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme constitute acceptance of the Scheme. Employees who have not withdrawn or utilised the unilaterally deposited benefits, after withdrawal of their VRS application, have not accepted the Scheme. Such employees are entitled to reinstatement with continuity in service, back wages, and all consequential benefits, subject to refund of the deposited amount with interest.
Court Disposition
Petitions disposed of; Review Petition No. 53 of 2003 allowed; I.A. Nos. 1, 2, and 3 of 2003 allowed; I.A. Nos. 1-22 of 2003 allowed; I.A. Nos. 14 and 15 of 2003 dismissed.
Orders
- Review Petition No. 53 of 2003 allowed; appeal arising out of Uttaranchal High Court judgment is dismissed and High Court judgment upheld.
- Applicants in I.A. Nos. 1, 2, and 3 reinstated with continuity in service, back wages, and all consequential benefits, subject to refunding the amount deposited in their bank accounts with interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment