BALBIR SINGH DELHI ADMN. DELHI versus D.N. KADIAN, M.M. DELHI & ANR.
Prior sanction under Section 197(3) Cr.P.C. is required only when the alleged offence has been committed while acting or purporting to act in discharge of official duty. Tampering of Search Memos while they were in Court custody was not done in discharge of official duty; therefore, prior sanction was not necessary.
- Parties
- Appellant: Balbir Singh; Appellant: Ram Shankar; Respondent: D.N. Kadian; Respondent: M.M. Delhi
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Criminal Appeal 844/85 dismissed; Criminal Appeal 845/85 partly allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Prior Sanction Under S.197(3) Cr.p.c., Prosecution of Delhi Police Members
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Balbir Singh
Appellant
Ram Shankar
Appellant
D.N. Kadian
Respondent
M.M. Delhi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecution of members of Delhi Police Force requires prior sanction under s. 197(3) Cr.P.C. and if so, when.
Ratio Decidendi
Prior sanction under Section 197(3) Cr.P.C. is required only when the alleged offence has been committed while acting or purporting to act in discharge of official duty. Tampering of Search Memos while they were in Court custody was not done in discharge of official duty; therefore, prior sanction was not necessary.
Court Disposition
Criminal Appeal 844/85 dismissed; Criminal Appeal 845/85 partly allowed.
Orders
- Judgment and Order of the High Court declaring the notification dated 7th April 1980 issued by the Lt. Governor of Delhi ultra vires is set aside.
- Learned Magistrate is directed to proceed with the case in accordance with law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment