BALWANT SINGH AND OTHERS versus STATE OF PUNJAB
Conviction under section 302 read with section 34 IPC is sustained as testimonies of PW3 and PW8, duly corroborated and supported by medical evidence, along with strong circumstantial links, are sufficient; specific attribution of injuries to each accused is not required where common intention is evident.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Balwant Singh; Appellant: Balwinder Singh; Appellant: Harbans Singh; Appellant: Malkiat Singh; Respondent: State of Punjab
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Common Intention, Evidence, Section 302 IPC, Section 34 IPC
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Balwant Singh
Appellant
Balwinder Singh
Appellant
Harbans Singh
Appellant
Malkiat Singh
Appellant
State of Punjab
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conviction under section 302 read with section 34 IPC is sustainable based on testimonies of two witnesses despite some witnesses turning hostile
- 2 Whether it is necessary to attribute specific injuries to particular accused under section 34 IPC
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction under section 302 read with section 34 IPC is sustained as testimonies of PW3 and PW8, duly corroborated and supported by medical evidence, along with strong circumstantial links, are sufficient; specific attribution of injuries to each accused is not required where common intention is evident.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment