INDIAN COUNCIL OF LEGAL AID AND ADVICE, ETC. ETC. versus BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR.
Rule 9 barring enrolment of persons above 45 years is ultra vires the Advocates Act, 1961, and violates Article 14 of the Constitution as it is discriminatory, arbitrary, unreasonable, and beyond the rule-making powers of the Bar Council of India.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Indian Council of Legal Aid and Advice, etc. etc.; Respondent: Bar Council of India and another
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petitions allowed; Rule 9 struck down as ultra vires and unconstitutional
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Bar Council Rules, Age Restriction for Enrolment as Advocate, Equality Under Article 14
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Indian Council of Legal Aid and Advice, etc. etc.
Petitioner
Bar Council of India and another
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Rule 9 of Bar Council of India Rules barring entry of persons who completed 45 years of age for enrolment as advocate is valid
- 2 Whether Bar Council of India has power under the Advocates Act, 1961 to make such a rule
- 3 Whether Rule 9 is discriminatory and violates Article 14 of the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 9 barring enrolment of persons above 45 years is ultra vires the Advocates Act, 1961, and violates Article 14 of the Constitution as it is discriminatory, arbitrary, unreasonable, and beyond the rule-making powers of the Bar Council of India.
Court Disposition
Petitions allowed; Rule 9 struck down as ultra vires and unconstitutional
Orders
- Rule 9 in Chapter III of Part VI of the Bar Council of India Rules is struck down as ultra vires the Act and opposed to Article 14 of the Constitution.
- Bar Council of India and State Bar Councils are directed not to implement Rule 9.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment